Event details


  1. Roll Call
  2. Scribe nomination
  3. Review minutes of previous meeting at

  4. Discuss Configuration Management issues 33 and 34
  5. Continue review, discussion, and voting on Change Management open issues 27, 28, 29, and 32. There has been no progress on the one open action item: Nick & Jim to review IBM change management link types in commonly installed process packages, and add terms and desirable support levels to issue 28.

  6. Any other business


Edited Chat transcript from room: oslc-ccm 2016-11-03 GMT-08:00

[07:08] Nick Crossley (IBM): Nick to scribe

[07:09] Nick Crossley (IBM): Brian will not be able to join us for about 6 months - we are looking for a replacement

[07:09] Nick Crossley (IBM): Jim unable to join us today

[07:10] Nick Crossley (IBM): Jim and Nick have not yet completed their action item to review IBM change request properties - hope to do so before next month's meeting

[07:10] Nick Crossley (IBM): No meeting in two week's time as we will be at the ICE conference in Long Beach

[07:11] Nick Crossley (IBM): Previous meeting minutes at

[07:13] Nick Crossley (IBM): Minutes accepted

[07:13] David Honey (Persistent/IBM):

[07:20] Nick Crossley (IBM): Discussion about how clients might find query end points to find parent configs by query

[07:21] Nick Crossley (IBM): Martin asked what the query syntax would be; Nick volunteers to write an example.

[07:23] Nick Crossley (IBM): Nick has concerns about how reliable and complete any LDPC for parents could be in a federated / distributed environment.

[07:23] Nick Crossley (IBM): Nick suggests we revisit after he provides a sample query

[07:24] Nick Crossley (IBM): Martin would like to see some standardization around this topic of finding the parents, via query or LDPC.

[07:26] Nick Crossley (IBM):

[07:34] Nick Crossley (IBM): Nick described history of the topic of Activity results - reliance on Automation progress on 2.1 or later specs.

[07:35] Nick Crossley (IBM): David described possible need to handle compound results for hierarchic operations, returning a list of results, each with associated errors or warnings

[07:41] Nick Crossley (IBM): Suggestion: Nick to write up a suggestion for how we might specify a compound result with warnings, for discussion with this TC, and other possible stakeholders

[07:51] Nick Crossley (IBM): Discussion on Change Management issues will be deferred until Jim can attend.

[07:54] Nick Crossley (IBM): Short discussion on ordering in RDF: rdf:List vs. using explicit ordering properties. rdf:List is not ideal for SPARQL queries.

[07:55] Nick Crossley (IBM): No other business.

[07:55] Nick Crossley (IBM): Meeting adjourned.

Meetings/Telecon2016.11.03 (last edited 2016-11-03 18:15:38 by ndjc)