Event details


  1. Scribe nomination
  2. Roll Call
  3. Approval of July 9 minutes

  4. Next meeting August 6
  5. Actions from the previous meeting
    • The current list of voting members will be published along with the agenda prior to each meeting
    • Jim A and Martin S to meet next week to discuss project timeline
    • Martin P to update Issue 9; final review and vote at next meeting
    • Vote on adoption of issue 13 and dropping issue 10 at next meeting
  6. Road map for standards publication
    • Conforming implementations we can reference?
  7. Selected Issues from issues list

  8. Other business

Voting Rights

Held by:



Martin Sarabura


David Honey





Chat transcript from room: oslc

[07:05] Martin Sarabura (PTC):

[07:05] David Honey (IBM): Minutes accepted.

[07:08] David Honey (IBM): Timelines: Goal is to TC draft for public review in September. Public review is 60 days.

[07:08] David Honey (IBM): Goal is to be able to vote in December.

[07:18] Jim Amsden (IBM): December vote is for Committee Specification

[07:20] David Honey (IBM): Can a spec dependent on core go to public review before OSLC core does?

[07:20] David Honey (IBM): Jim: Will check with Chet on rules for OASIS.

[07:21] David Honey (IBM): Nick: Not found anything from initial info from Chet on email voting.

[07:22] Martin Sarabura (PTC):

[07:28] David Honey (IBM): If service providers are tracked resources that can be indexed in an indexing provider, does this help in discovery?

[07:31] David Honey (IBM): Steve Speicher removed some predicates in core vocab that were not used. Cannot do this in 3.0. If a predicate was valid in 2.0, it must be valid in 3.0.

[07:32] David Honey (IBM): One such property is oslc:usage.

[07:41] David Honey (IBM): Will need to merge core 2.0 and 3.0 properties into 3.0 spec.

[07:42] David Honey (IBM): Core has a file per resource shape.

[07:43] David Honey (IBM): CM has related shapes in one file.

[07:49] David Honey (IBM):

[07:50] David Honey (IBM): All agreed Issue 13 should be closed.

[07:50] David Honey (IBM):

[07:54] David Honey (IBM): For preview, GET with an Accept header with appropriate media type. This is different from a delegated dialog to select one or more resources, or create a resource.

[07:55] David Honey (IBM): Proposal: Core 3.0 should adopt 2.0's use of Accept header.

[07:56] David Honey (IBM): Ought to be a consistent way of handling dialog resize.

[07:58] David Honey (IBM): Should add support for resize width.

[07:59] David Honey (IBM): Preview will support height resize.

[08:00] David Honey (IBM): Related to on icon size.

[08:02] David Honey (IBM): Use of Prefer header for icon size is ok. Not asking for different content - asking for a different size of icon.

[08:06] Martin Pain (IBM): Advertising the existence of a compact resource would be done through an Accept header (on the individual resource, not the container) not a Link header

[08:09] David Honey (IBM): Jim: Continue use JIRA, use email for collaboration on discussions on JIRA issues.

[08:17] David Honey (IBM): Action on Jim, Martin for next week: Review issues list and see if any can be closed.

[08:18] David Honey (IBM): Nick: Question about compatibility and getting feedback from steering committee. No disagreements about goals.

[08:19] Nick Crossley (IBM):

[08:28] David Honey (IBM): Need some way to link domain tool specific resource shapes that extend/augment OSLC spec shapes.

[08:29] David Honey (IBM): to the shapes they extend.

[08:32] David Honey (IBM): Meeting adjourned. Martin cannot attend next meeting.

Meetings/Telecon2015.07.23 (last edited 2015-07-24 18:23:16 by sarabura)