Meeting minutes 24 March 2011
- Roll: Martin, Patrick, Robin Regrets: Dave
- Approved as posted
10th March : http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tab/email/archives/201103/msg00008.html Approved w/o Agreed to post to wiki
- ACTION-20110225-2: Martin to draft a review announcement for the interop/testability docs. Done ACTION-20110225-3: Staff to clarify the relationship between the new UI work visible at oasis.kavi.com and phase 1 and/or phase 2 kavi-5 roll out. Done. communication was received from Greg.
Standards Dependency and Citations update:
- Patrick is generating a way to automatically parse a list of bibliographies. Should have a completed topic map by end of the month. It will need proof reading.
Interop/Testing Policy Update:
- Final draft of email to members:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tab/email/archives/201103/msg00028.html Agreed to send to the member list via Scott. The chairs list might result in discussion which must take place via the comment facility.
Email from Greg: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/staff-board-tab/email/archives/201103/msg00004.html Dave raised the questions to the Board. Greg had provided a report to the Board, and these in effect had answered our questions. The relevant pieces are in the email from Greg above. There are effectively two website that will "come together" during roll out:
The testing that is being planned is focussed on the system level, but little thought seems to have been put into user interface testing, and the drupal site has a lot to be desired. There is a real need for usability testing in addition to usability inspection . We note from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usability_testing the following quote: "Elaborate usability tests are a waste of resources. The best results come from testing no more than five users and running as many small tests as you can afford.". Such usability tests need to be done prior to the rollout to catch any obvious design flaws.
Approved Errata Naming Issues:
- Robin soliciting opinions on the following:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tab/201103/msg00031.html Looking at part 5 of Robin's email we agreed not to introduce any new terminology/abbreviations. An errata is a deliverable that should use the normal progression stages, though it does have restrictions on the content of the deliverable. If TAB members have opinions on other aspects of the post please let Robin know.